Select a peer-reviewed article that is focused on one of the following subject area:
Port Security
Include the following information, but in a single narrative, NOT a short Q&A. Use these questions to frame your work:
Article name and author
Is there a research question that is clearly stated or implied? If so, what is it? Do you believe it is academically rigorous?
Is there a hypothesis, thesis, or central argument that is clearly stated or implied? If so, what is it?
Does the Author answer the “So What?” Were you convinced that the study was worth doing?
Is the study unique in any way?
What are the main points of the article?
What kind of literature review is provided, and/or what sources are cited? How well does it fulfill that purpose?
How well does the Author explain their method of collecting and analyzing data? Could you replicate the study based on the article before you?
Is there any discussion of variables? If so, how? Does the Author look at alternative points of view?
Do the study’s findings support the author’s Goals or Thesis? How valid are they?
Does the conclusion follow from the evidence provided? Does it persuade you? Why or Why Not?
Does the Author address the implications of these results? If so, how comprehensively is this done?
Do you notice other strengths and limitations of this study?
Technical RequirementsYour paper must be at least 3-5 pages (the Title and Reference pages do not count towards the minimum limit).
Scholarly and credible references should be used.
Type in Times New Roman, 12 point, and double space.
Students will follow the current APA Style as the sole citation and reference style used in written work submitted as part of coursework.
Points will be deducted for using Wikipedia or encyclopedic-type sources. It is highly advised to utilize books, peer-reviewed journals, articles, archived documents, etc.
All submissions will be graded using the assignment rubric.
Use the template provided to develop your assignment.Rubric Name: HLSS Assignment Rubric 500-600 Level
PrintCriteria20 pointsAccomplished17 pointsDeveloping15 pointsBeginning13 pointsCriterion Score
Synthesis of KnowledgeStudent exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well-constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment.Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Introduction of thesis is not evident, and reader must look deeper to discover the focus of the writer. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements./ 20
Foundation of KnowledgeStudent demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. Whereas, there are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas./ 20
Application of KnowledgeStudent demonstrates a higher-level of critical thinking necessary for graduate level work. Learner provides a strategic approach in presenting examples of problem solving or critical thinking, while drawing logical conclusions that are not immediately obvious. Student provides well-supported ideas and reflection with a variety of current and/or worldviews in the assignment. Student presents a genuine intellectual development of ideas throughout assignment.Student exhibits a good command of critical thinking skills in the presentation of material and supporting statements. Assignment demonstrates the student’s above average use of relating concepts by using a variety of factors. Overall, student provides adequate conclusions, with 2 or fewer errors.Student takes a common, conventional approach in guiding the reader through various linkages and connections presented in assignment. However, student presents a limited perspective on key concepts throughout assignment. Student appears to have problems applying information in a problem-solving manner.Student demonstrates beginning understanding of key concepts, but overlooks critical details. Learner is unable to apply information in a problem-solving fashion. Student presents confusing statements and facts in assignment. No evidence or little semblance of critical thinking skills./ 20
Organization of Ideas/FormatStudent thoroughly understands and excels in explaining all major points. An original, unique, and/or imaginative approach to overall ideas, concepts, and findings is presented. Overall format of assignment includes an appropriate introduction (or abstract), well- developed paragraphs, and conclusion. Finished assignment demonstrates student’s ability to plan and organize research in a logical sequence.Student explains the majority of points and concepts in the assignment. Learner demonstrates a good skill level in formatting and organizing material in assignment. Student presents an above average level of preparedness, with few formatting errors.Learner applies some points and concepts incorrectly. Student uses a variety of formatting styles, with some inconsistencies throughout the paper. Assignment does not have a continuous pattern of logical sequencing.Assignment reveals formatting errors and a lack of organization. Student presents an incomplete attempt to provide linkages or explanation of key terms./ 20
Writing and Research SkillStudent demonstrates an excellent command of grammar, as well as presents research in a clear and concise writing style. The work represents a thorough, extensive understanding of word usage. Student excels in the selection and development of a well- planned research assignment. Assignment is error-free and reflects student’s ability to prepare graduate-level writing for possible publication in a peer-reviewed (refereed) journal. Student provides sophisticated synthesis of complex body of information in the preparation of assignment. Research provided by student contributes significantly to the development of the overall thesis. Student incorporates more than the minimum quality references in the development of the overall thesis. Student incorporates a variety of research resources and methodology in the preparation of assignment.