Evaluate each handout separately using the concepts related to Health Literacy, Clear & Simple, Cultural Respect and Plain Language from the NIH Clear Communication website.
Discuss the results. Which handout is more effective at communicating the intended message and why? How would you revise the other handout to make it a more effective communication tool?
Module1_Assignment2_Rubric
Module1_Assignment2_Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluation of handout 1 using the concepts related to Health Literacy, Clear & Simple, Cultural Respect and Plain Language from the NIH Clear Communication website
10 to >9.0 ptsOutstanding
Fully developed and supported, insightful, and scholarly evaluation of handout 1 using the concepts related to Health Literacy, Clear & Simple, Cultural Respect and Plain Language from the NIH Clear Communication website
9 to >8.0 ptsVery Good
Generally thorough and well organized and supported evaluation of handout 1 using the concepts related to Health Literacy, Clear & Simple, Cultural Respect and Plain Language from the NIH Clear Communication website, with minimal concerns
8 to >7.0 ptsMeets Expectations
Adequate and supported evaluation of handout 1 using the concepts related to Health Literacy, Clear & Simple, Cultural Respect and Plain Language from the NIH Clear Communication website, but with infrequent and minor issues
7 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Missing, unoriginal, or did not adequately evaluate handout 1 using the concepts related to Health Literacy, Clear & Simple, Cultural Respect and Plain Language from the NIH Clear Communication website
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluation of handout 2 using the concepts related to Health Literacy, Clear & Simple, Cultural Respect and Plain Language from the NIH Clear Communication website
10 to >9.0 ptsOutstanding
Fully developed and supported, insightful, and scholarly evaluation of handout 2 using the concepts related to Health Literacy, Clear & Simple, Cultural Respect and Plain Language from the NIH Clear Communication website
9 to >8.0 ptsVery Good
Generally thorough and well organized and supported evaluation of handout 2 using the concepts related to Health Literacy, Clear & Simple, Cultural Respect and Plain Language from the NIH Clear Communication website, with minimal concerns
8 to >7.0 ptsMeets Expectations
Adequate and supported evaluation of handout 2 using the concepts related to Health Literacy, Clear & Simple, Cultural Respect and Plain Language from the NIH Clear Communication website, but with infrequent and minor issues
7 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Missing, unoriginal, or did not adequately evaluate handout 2 using the concepts related to Health Literacy, Clear & Simple, Cultural Respect and Plain Language from the NIH Clear Communication website
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion of which handout is more effective at communicating the intended message and why, and description of how would you revise the other handout to make it a more effective communication tool
10 to >9.0 ptsOutstanding
Fully developed and supported, insightful, and scholarly discussion of which handout is more effective at communicating the intended message and how would you revise the other handout to make it a more effective communication tool
9 to >8.0 ptsVery Good
Generally thorough, well organized, and supported discussion of which handout is more effective at communicating the intended message and why, and describes how would you revise the other handout to make it a more effective communication tool, with minimal concerns
8 to >7.0 ptsMeets Expectations
Adequate and supported discussion of which handout is more effective at communicating the intended message and why, and describes how would you revise the other handout to make it a more effective communication tool, but with infrequent and minor issues
7 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Missing, unoriginal, or does not adequately discuss which handout is more effective at communicating the intended message and why, and describe how would you revise the other handout to make it a more effective communication tool
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Communication: Extent to which writing and reference list is professional, appropriate, clear, properly formatted, grammatically and structurally correct, synthesized, supported, and scholarly
10 to >9.0 ptsOutstanding
Writing is fully developed, exceptionally well organized, synthesized, supported, scholarly, and free of writing errors. Concepts are connected throughout paper with appropriate transitions and multiple appropriate resources and examples.
9 to >8.0 ptsVery Good
Writing is generally sound, structurally and grammatically correct, and properly formatted, with minimal concerns. Synthesis is demonstrated and ideas are supported without reliance on quoting.
8 to >7.0 ptsMeets Expectations
Adequately meets writing expectations for a paper, but with infrequent and minor issues
7 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Writing does not meet basic expectations for a paper (e.g. clarity, tone, organization, grammar, spelling, punctuation, format, source citation, references, synthesis of source material, insufficient originality, etc.).
10 pts
Total Points: 40